NanoBryg rss syndication » A Good Beer Blog » October 13, 2011

Feeds

6981 items (6981 unread) in 17 feeds

Breweries (1272 unread)

• Mikkel(ler)'s Blog (98 unread)
• GourmetBryggeriet (121 unread)
• Nyt fra Ølakademiet (1053 unread)

Bloggers (4258 unread)

• Hop Talk (1062 unread)
• Knut Albert's beer blog (851 unread)
• Hail the Ale! Beer Blog (102 unread)
• Pfiff! (165 unread)
• Hedonist Beer Jive (425 unread)
• Beer of the Trip! (25 unread)
• The Beer Tourist (32 unread)
• For The Love Of Beer (105 unread)
• Portland Beer Blog (93 unread)
• A Good Beer Blog (1398 unread)

Craftbrewers (1451 unread)

• Larsblog (68 unread)
• Dyrehavegaardsb (70 unread)
• The Champagne of Blogs (166 unread)
• The Brew Site (1147 unread)

A Good Beer Blog (1 unread)

• 

  Pete Revives The Beer Blogging Ethics Question

  Posted: October 13th, 2011, 2:42pm CEST by Alan McLeod

  We did this one in 2008 but it is good to visit this question repeatedly. Me? I like cash. Because, apparently, the people who run pubs, make beer and publish beer periodicals like it as well. There is an odd assumption that bloggers (and drinkers) participate out of "passion" - a catch all word for sucker far too often.

  But there is a question in all of this. Go read Pete and tell us what you think... here or there.