Feeds

6981 items (6981 unread) in 17 feeds

Breweries Breweries
Bloggers Bloggers
Craftbrewers Craftbrewers

A Good Beer Blog (26 unread)

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/30/History__Heritage_and_Plain_Old_Marketing_Actually_Differ'

    History, Heritage and Plain Old Marketing Actually Differ

    Posted: November 30th, 2011, 2:09pm CET by Alan McLeod

    I think this is one of the more naive articles I have ever read about beer:

    “The story is critical because it’s what differentiates a beer from any other beer,” Calagione told me. Still, he added, “just because you hear of some creepy group of Norwegians that 300 years ago put the blood of virgins into beer doesn’t mean you should replicate it. You have to have a story, but can you have a story and also make a world-class beer?”... In a way that other drinks often don’t, these beers explicitly convey the distinctive tastes of distinctive pasts. “I can write stuff and bang on about, ‘Oh, the beers were very different back then,’ but people don’t listen very well,” says Pattinson, who is now trying to bring back Scottish India pale ales. “If you give them a bottle of something to drink, they’ll understand.”

    Spot the difference? Chalk and cheese. "Story" can mean many many things but it is rarely used in relation to beer to mean something that is actually true. How many "modern interpretations" have anything to do with sitting about the big mid-eastern clay pot and sucking through a straw? How many celebrate American colonial corn beer? Damn few. Yet we seldom see anyone really asking whether what is being foisted is authentic.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/29/An_Update_On_The_OCB_And_The_Commentary_Wiki'

    An Update On The OCB And The Commentary Wiki

    Posted: November 29th, 2011, 2:52am CET by Alan McLeod

    So, the forecast for the last four weeks over at the wiki that was set out in my Halloween post "And Quiet Flows the OCBeerCommentary Wiki" came to pass. This is going to be a longish process. But it advances. I just finished loading the Index of Articles by Author to the point Stan managed to get to, which was mid-"J". I have gotten it to "L" and hope to fit in the rest before Christmas so we can cross reference commentary to the indexing. Oh, think of the data mining possibilities. Any volunteers want to load a letter or two? If you have email and a copy of the OCB, please let me know.

    The biggest news related to The Oxford Companion to Beer is that it is hitting the top 50 on Amazon.com. It is sitting at #44 right now but has been as high as #15 that I have seen. This is good for beer. Don't be confused like the deeply afflicted Protz. The wiki displays the parasitic nature of the beer nerd in nicest sort way. The OCB is the Wildebeest while we are the Oxpecker. And it's only $26 bucks right now. Buy it. Right now.

    And what have we found? Well, a month ago, Clay Risen in The Atlantic saw only 40 entries and considered the commentary mainly about interpretation. While he was fairly incorrect on the last point, we are now up to 62 entries and many have multiple comments and corrections. Just look at the entries for "ale", "ale house" and "ale pole." More interesting to me, however, is that some of the entries are mainly elaborations of the topic, building upon what is there. So, we can now see that Canada's brewing experience was years and perhaps decades older. We can see that the US state of New York had a rich post-Prohibition hop growing experience. Neato.

    62 entries? That's 5.63% of the book. By Christmas, maybe it's 9% or 12%. Who knows? What is good is how information gets fine tuned through the wiki - not the scorecard. Join up. If you have a copy now or get one for Christmas, let me know if you'd like to add any thoughts by emailing me at beerblog@gmail.com.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/29/An_Update_On_The_OCB_And_The_Commentary_Wiki'

    An Update On The OCB And The Commentary Wiki

    Posted: November 29th, 2011, 2:52am CET by Alan McLeod

    So, the forecast for the last four weeks over at the wiki that was set out in my Halloween post "And Quiet Flows the OCBeerCommentary Wiki" came to pass. This is going to be a longish process. But it advances. I just finished loading the Index of Articles by Author to the point Stan managed to get to, which was mid-"J". I have gotten it to "L" and hope to fit in the rest before Christmas so we can cross reference commentary to the indexing. Oh, think of the data mining possibilities. Any volunteers want to load a letter or two? If you have email and a copy of the OCB, please let me know.

    The biggest news related to The Oxford Companion to Beer is that it is hitting the top 50 on Amazon.com. It is sitting at #44 right now but has been as high as #15 that I have seen. This is good for beer. Don't be confused like the deeply afflicted Protz. The wiki displays the parasitic nature of the beer nerd in nicest sort way. The OCB is the Wildebeest while we are the Oxpecker. And it's only $26 bucks right now. Buy it. Right now.

    And what have we found? Well, a month ago, Clay Risen in The Atlantic saw only 40 entries and considered the commentary mainly about interpretation. While he was fairly incorrect on the last point, we are now up to 62 entries and many have multiple comments and corrections. Just look at the entries for "ale", "ale house" and "ale pole." More interesting to me, however, is that some of the entries are mainly elaborations of the topic, building upon what is there. So, we can now see that Canada's brewing experience was years and perhaps decades older. We can see that the US state of New York had a rich post-Prohibition hop growing experience. Neato.

    62 entries? That's 5.63% of the book. By Christmas, maybe it's 9% or 12%. Who knows? What is good is how information gets fine tuned through the wiki - not the scorecard. Join up. If you have a copy now or get one for Christmas, let me know if you'd like to add any thoughts by emailing me at beerblog@gmail.com.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/27/Day_Nine__Now_That_US_Thanks_Are_Done___It_s_True_Yule_'

    Day Nine: Now That US Thanks Are Done - It's True Yule!

    Posted: November 27th, 2011, 6:31pm CET by Alan McLeod

    When does Yuletide begin? The first snow? The first child's question about Santa? Or is it the photo contest? Who knows. In any event, we are well and truly underway and have more announcements of prizes:

    New Jeff Alworth of Beervana, who is madly researching in Europe for his book The Beer Bible just picked up a Westy glass as well as a bottle of 12 for some lucky beer nerd who gets to choose either the vessel for every or the brew for one day.¹
    New Adrian Tierney-Jones and CAMRA have offered two copies of Great British Pubs.
    New Martyn Cornell, the Zythophile himself, has pledged a copy of his book Amber Gold and Black.
    Creemore Springs Brewery - whose prizes I covet. Are they the most generous?
    Maximiliano Bahnson, author of Prague: A Pisshead's Pub Guide and a guy I want to have a beer with.
    David Selden, 33 books the guide to taking your own drinking life seriously.
    Grand Teton Brewing of Idaho, a much welcomed newcomer to the contest.
    All About Beer magazine, a great supporter of this here thing.
    Narragansett Brewing, home of, yes, my favorite porter and another much welcomed newcomer to the contest.
    Roland and Russell, Ontario fine beer, spirits and wine importer.
    TAPS The Beer Magazine, one of our finest supporters year after year.
    Ron Pattinson, author and YouTube phenom.

    More photos. John Lewington is first up. The picture up there is his take on a medieval morality play entitled "strong lager" - or "how I ended up sleeping on a bench in public during the middle of the day."

    Peter Collins of Wesmore Digital in Cambridge Ontario has sent in these eight images for your consideration:


    Sean Inman of Beer Search Party in, I think, LA Cali sent in this view to the right of a Christmas message hidden in plain view. And Kristin Mayo of North Carolina has provided this reflective view to the left.

    There. We are caught up for now. I still have more prize giving prospects to hit up and we need more entries, too. Send your eight best pictures to me at beerblog@gmail.com. The more of you, of course, the merrier.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/26/Oregon__Sanctuary__Full_Sail_Brewing__Port_Hood'

    Oregon: Sanctuary, Full Sail Brewing, Port Hood

    Posted: November 26th, 2011, 2:58am CET by Alan McLeod

    A beer. Imagine writing about a beer on a beer blog. It's about time. I am finally past a bug and waves of ramifications that have basically hammered me since early October. No more. As Phoenix rises so do I turn to beer for purposes other than medicinal.

    A tan head resolves to froth and rim over light orange chestnut beer. A sniff or two gives that nutmeggy, malty aroma the cool kids are all talking about. In the mouth, burlap and 16th century nut and bark spices with sweet grainy pumpernickel. Not all that far off a pumpkin beer in a way. That way being no pumpkin. A slightly lighter take on a dubbel, it is quite tasty with an attractive bright acidity. Bought just across the big river, I may well see if there are more if we go shopping tomorrow for good Vermont cheddar at eight bucks a kilo. Viva! Viva good Vermont cheddar at eight bucks a kilo!!!

    The BAers are slightly less enthusiastic. At under five bucks a bomber, I am quite pleased with the value. Govern yourselves accordingly.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/25/Can_A__Style__Ever_Be_More_Than_A_Helpful_Generality_'

    Can A "Style" Ever Be More Than A Helpful Generality?

    Posted: November 25th, 2011, 1:45am CET by Alan McLeod

    Levels of abstraction. That is what this style stuff is about. Not about what it is but how it can be grouped. I think. Two articles got me thinking about this today. In The New York Times, Eric Asimov talked about "sour" beer and got into a range of beers that I would never consider to fall under that adjective. And the great ATJ discussed the challenges posed by grappling with the idea of Abbey beer.

    So I get back to the original question: what is an Abbey Ale? Is there such a thing? Trappist is an appellation — it covers dubbel and tripel and very strong dark beer. Abbey? It seems to be 5-6% (but then looking back at my notes I find Silly Brewery making a 9.5% one), sweetish, gold in colour with reddish hints, but then it could be a brighter gold or a darker gold. In one French brewery I was given one with rice in the mix, which gave it an almost ethereal lightness of touch, which didn’t work for me. So is it a marketing device? On the label the picture of a fat cheery monk or a sombre looking abbey and the promise of heaven in a bottle seems to be a popular device. Marketing then. That’s the way my thoughts are going.

    One thing pops into my mind when I read that passage. And it is not intended to give the dim and greasy hope. But is it so bad to consider that marketing might have some actual work to do? Maybe the idea that you can find valid maltiness with a pinch of thoughtful Belgian yeasty spice is enough to be Abbey. Can't we gather around that cause?

    Yet Eric Asimov's inclusion of Goose Island Sofie and Ithaca White Gold as sour? That goes further, doesn't it? Does marketing need to make sour out of, you know, tang? I had that great CNY beer last year and mentioned "I had one the other night that had spent a long time in the stash and was gorgeous, showing lots of tangy beer gone bad quality." Is tangy beer gone bad sour or is it something else? And is Sofie sour? Really? Stan wrote a great post this summer about the weird things we love in weird beer. But does that make for sour?

    I've undertaken my sour beer studies and included a lot of things... but now I wished I called it "Acids I Drink" or some thing like that. Tangs, sours, twings and twangs? They all have their own worthy place. But by bundling them under "sour" are we not treating them like we treat Abbey beers, labeling them with a euphemism? And if we do - but do so to aid in understanding by adding an abstraction... is that so wrong?

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/24/Day_Five__More_Entries_More_Prizes_And_That_Green_Sign'

    Day Five: More Entries More Prizes And That Green Sign

    Posted: November 24th, 2011, 2:08am CET by Alan McLeod

    I will inundate you for a bit here. The prizes and entries do flow in and I have to get them out of the inbox and into the... hmm... what would Protz call it... the information super highways. Plenty to do. No time to doddle bothering with that sort of thing. First, here is the updated prize giver list:

    New Grand Teton Brewing of Idaho, a much welcomed newcomer to the contest.
    New All About Beer magazine, a great supporter of this here thing.
    New Narragansett Brewing, home of, yes, my favorite porter and another much welcomed newcomer to the contest.
    Roland and Russell, Ontario fine beer, spirits and wine importer.
    TAPS The Beer Magazine, one of our finest supporters year after year.
    Ron Pattinson, author and YouTube phenom.
    Creemore Springs Brewery - whose prizes I covet. Are they the most generous?
    Maximiliano Bahnson, author of Prague: A Pisshead's Pub Guide and a guy I want to have a beer with.
    David Selden, 33 books the guide to taking your own drinking life seriously.

    There will be more. There are two major publishers considering their options. Yes, there are. OK, go on. Go about your business.

    Entries! Bart Riccardi of Tampa Bay, Florida, who name provides an alarmingly good opportunity to roll ones r's has given us these entries:


    And way up there is what I like to call a strategic move. It appears that John Lewington of England is sending in a photo a day at a time to coax me into highlighting his entries. The bastard. If they were not so good I would not buy it. Not at all. He tells us it's not "strictly a beer photo but if you close your eyes, you can almost smell the fumes of real London ale and vinegar, we put put on our chips here in England, emanating from the doorway of this wonderful pub." That is just cheating. Because you can. You can smell that smell. Cheater pant John.

    Green sign? Is it for running towards when you really have to pee or run under if you are a CAMRA organizer and see a keg or bottle of beer? Not sure.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/23/Day_Four__The_First_Photo_Contest_Entries_Roar_In'

    Day Four: The First Photo Contest Entries Roar In

    Posted: November 23rd, 2011, 1:34am CET by Alan McLeod

    It is fun when I get to see these entries for the first time every autumn. The first blizzard of the season is just missing us to the south tonight but it is starting to feel Christmas around here. Think I will mull me a little something as I consider what we have received in the inbox. First, above is an entry from 2007 Grand International Winner, John Lewington of England. Is that green sign over the door directing me where to go if I really need to pee?

    Fellow Engerlanders Boak and Bailey - of the surprisingly well named Boak and Bailey's Beer Blog - have sent in these eight entries. I like like the train compartment shot. I should have a category for beer and trains, too:


    Max Bahnson of Pivní Filosof out of Prague is one of that happy happy tribe, those who submit entries as well as prizes. He sent in this set of six photos for your consideration:


    Regular participant Patrick Hirlehey of Ontario sent in these entries with titles like "Baby Vomit Supreme," "Tempest, Saaz, Spice," and "OMG WTF DDH IPA LOL" - which code I am somewhat pleased to say I can read... but only because he told me what it meant


    There you go. The first wave of entries. If no one else joins in, well, these guys get all the prizes. Do you want that? No you do not. Send in your own pics to beerblog@gmail.com. Do it.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/22/Your_Late_November_Monday_Night_Beer_Round_Up'

    Your Late November Monday Night Beer Round Up

    Posted: November 22nd, 2011, 2:35am CET by Alan McLeod

    While this contest gets some traction, there are other things worth thinking about. Well, other things that are about beer. Plus, I want to do more fancy bullet pointy lists on this blog. Fancy lists are a clear sign of quality. You agree, right?

    Θ Is it just me or is it great that the Charlevoix Downtown Development Authority of that Michigan town is declaring their economic need for a microbrewery? Has anyone told them about that brewery in Quebec called Charlevoix that makes those beers I like? Two words: branch plant.

    Θ I am really impressed with Greg Clow announcing that his brew newswire about the brewing industry is branching out into a dinner series. What I like about it is that Greg is acting as impresario, the orchestrator who neither brews nor cooks, neither retails nor wholesales. He's been blogging the TO beer scene since 2006 and has logged more photos of plates of food with a drink next to it on Twitter than any other Canadian. Should be good.

    Θ I find this rather extended article on the branding of booze for women really quite odd. It's like an anti-binge, anti-sexy beer ad theory. Why use women to sell booze to men when you can use women to sell booze to women! Your thoughts may differ.

    Θ And finally, let's talk about Lew. Lew announced he is seeking funding through Kickstarter for a TV show to be called American Beer Blogger. He is exactly the right guy to do this and is going through it in entirely the right way. Pledge. Pledge a lot. Make it happen.

    There. As you have read that even more gifts have been pledged for the beer blog Yule, Xmas, Kwanzaa and Hanukkah 2011 photo contest. More picture have come in, too. Enter. Offer a gift. But most of all, pledge a chunk of change to Lew's great idea.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/20/Day_Two__The_Prizes_And_Entries_Start_To_Come_In'

    Day Two: The Prizes And Entries Start To Come In

    Posted: November 20th, 2011, 6:01pm CET by Alan McLeod

    I always wonder if anyone might participate in this contest. I get slightly anxious 'round about early October. But it begins. Entries arrived by email this very morn. I have yet to truly begun hitting people up for prizes but so far we have the following fine folk pledging:

    Roland and Russell, Ontario fine beer, spirits and wine importer.
    TAPS The Beer Magazine.
    Ron Pattinson, author and YouTube phenom.
    Creemore Springs Brewery.
    Maximiliano Bahnson, author of Prague: A Pisshead's Pub Guide
    Update David Selden, 33 books.

    Have I left you out? Put a note in the comments or by email to beerblog@gmail.com if you are able to give a prize from your brewery, of your book or in some other wee giftie in reasonable form. Direct prizes only, please. Gift certificates from beer stores are well loved. But the pumping of a website's URL in exchange for the false promise of getting something from a friend? That is so 2007. Not doing that again. And why should we with such great legitimate sponsors as these and those who have supported in the past?

    And let me know if there is anything in particular you would like me to seek out for you. Creativity is rewarded. Seek and ye shall find. Doesn't hurt to ask.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/18/Ready__Set__Go___2011_s_Yuletide_Photo_Contest_Is_On___'

    Ready, Set, Go! 2011's Yuletide Photo Contest Is On!!!

    Posted: November 18th, 2011, 1:22pm CET by Alan McLeod

    Stan announced it, too. Send your entries to beerblog@gmail.com. Some rules here. More later if required. Up there is one of Andrew Mason of Illinois's entries from 2007. You can do that. Couldn't you? Could you? Have you?

    What prizes do you want? Many confirmed already but many more to be sought out.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/18/Table_Ring_Anger_And_Forgetting_About_The_Fun'

    Table Ring Anger And Forgetting About The Fun

    Posted: November 18th, 2011, 1:46am CET by Alan McLeod

    I am not a professional beer writer and this column is a good example of why. Pete Brown achieves a balance in this column that I don't think I could in my writing - but it is a challenging one.... which is why it is a very good read:

    ...I think this proves that you can perhaps take beer too seriously. Yes, there are times when I want to scream with rage at the way beer is disrespected, commoditised, trivialised and patronized. But I’ll admit there are also times when I want to say, ‘Guys, get a grip – it’s only beer.’ At the top of my beer blog I have the strapline, ‘Treating beer with the respect and irreverence it deserves since 2003’. I believe both are equally important...

    Know what he is talking about? Go have a read. What I like is how he takes two forms of respect related to beer and balances each against the other and against balance, too. I like it structurally but his point is also worth considering. So far over 5% of entries in the OCB have received reasonably interesting annotation of some sort - few of which have to do with the grinding of axes. After just a month or so. What if it gets to 17% or 23%? I don't think it means that much except for my original point that the Oxford Companion to Beer and thinking about beer deserves taking on. Because respecting beer includes respecting thinking about beer and facts about beer.

    But - like Pete says - not to the point we forget it is fun. And it is fun to think about beer, too.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/17/Book_Review__The_Economics_Of_Beer___Swinnen__ed.'

    Book Review: The Economics Of Beer - Swinnen, ed.

    Posted: November 17th, 2011, 12:23am CET by Alan McLeod

    I bought this because Simon told me to. Simon said.

    This book is a series of essays related to the 2009 conference of The Beeronomics Society. It says on its back cover that it "is the first economic analysis of the beer market and brewing industry" but that is just silly puffery. There have been loads of economic analysis of the beer market and brewing industry. Frankly we have been weighed down by them. Don't make me review Tremblay and Trembaly again. Do you remember those graphs and tables?

    This book is a lot like one of my favorite sets of essays, the papers from the "Cooperstown Symposium on Baseball and American Culture." It is also a lot like Beer and Philosophy, a set of essays which included one from me on the underlying philosophy of beer regulation in Canada. What they all have in common is that they are a collection of papers tackling aspects of a general topic from various points of view. In the TEOB you will find 18 papers from the 2009 conference organized under the four topics of history, consumption, industrial organization and the new beer markets. With any luck, as with the annual baseball conference but unlike Beer and Philosophy, the followup second conference of The Beeronomics Society will issue another volume of essays reflective of the topics covered in September 2011.

    So is it worth getting? For a book nerd like me, sure. I was a little uneasy with the superficiality of the first essay "A Brief Economic History of Beer" given it covered so much of time and culture so quickly. However, when I saw that there was an essay by Richard Unger, everyone's favorite beery medievalist and Renaissance man, I was won over. And the essay "Recent Economic Developments in the Import and Craft Segments of the US Brewing Industry" by the manical graph-huggers¹ T+T may serve as something of an update of their 2005 book. Best of all, each submission comes with its own bibliography alerting folk like me to other papers and texts that might be out there just waiting to be added to the book shelf.

    Published, too, by Oxford University Press, this book is another sign that we fans of beer and brewing live in lucky times. If I have more intelligent comment after reading a bit more, I will add it in the comments. But at this point this, too, looks like a good buy for the serious beer nerd.

    ¹ There are seven graphs and four table in just 18 pages!!!

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/15/Beer_Shopping_Ethics___How_Many_Do_You_Buy_'

    Beer Shopping Ethics - How Many Do You Buy?

    Posted: November 15th, 2011, 12:49am CET by Alan McLeod

    Finally! An ethical question that is not about the ethics of beer writing. I ask because, as I mentioned, Fuller's XX Strong Ale came to town on Saturday. Bought three, had two, gave away one. Then I noticed I was out. So I went back today. I had noticed 17 bottles were listed on the LCBO web site as still being on the one shelf at the one store in the region likely to get them. There were 12 when I got to the store. Might never see this one single run beer with limited supplies making it to North America. I took six.

    Was this piggish of me? I have no intention of sharing or even having them soon. Pure rat packery. Mine. Mine. Mine. Christmas is coming and if Santa disappoints I really might have to step in on my own behalf. I am happy. But was I wrong?

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/14/It_s_The_Week_The_2011_Xmas_Photo_Contest_Began'

    It's The Week The 2011 Xmas Photo Contest Began

    Posted: November 14th, 2011, 1:33am CET by Alan McLeod

    Do you have the Xmas beer pr0n photo fever yet? It is coming. Indeed, it is nigh. Right about now nigh in fact. A few prize packs have been pledged so far but we will hunt high and low for more. These are the rules. Because you can't have a good contest without strictly enforced arbitrary rules.

    • We have now long forgotten the bad old days of unlimited photos per entrant. In 2008, we had over 500 entries. That was nuts. Children cried again from the lack of a parent's attention. In 2009, with the five photo max rule, we got it down to down to a sensible 185. So, like last year, I am limiting it but like last year I am upping it to eight photos per person. I want to see if that makes a difference.
    • First rule as always: no photos of dishes of food with a beer next to it. They never win and they kinda make other people feel queasy. Your food is no better looking than your dog. Sorry to break the news.
    • More photos of beer and snow as well as beer and babies. Photos of beer and snow look great. Beer in nature generally looks good. But beer and snow is a winner. Snow in Italy? Even better. Beer and babies can either look good or look weird. Stay away from weird, please.
    • Again, pictures of beer and your pals all liquored up? More like the plate of food than snow. Not usually good. But you never know.
    • There is a prize for the crappiest photo. It is a crappy prize.
    • The contest opens on Friday, 18 November at noon eastern standard time, North America and goes to... what... Sunday December 11 at noon. More than three weeks. Over three weeks of art and prizes.

    So, we will do our job beating the bushes for an international selection of prizes that will surprise and delight. I am the sole arbitrator of victory and the prizes get delivered directly from the giver... unless you have to go get the prize. Make sense? Let's hope we see some photos as great as the 2009 winner by Kim Reed of Rochester, New York.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/12/A_Few_Saturday_Afternoon_Stories_You_Need_To_Know...'

    A Few Saturday Afternoon Stories You Need To Know...

    Posted: November 12th, 2011, 8:16pm CET by Alan McLeod

    ... or not. Saturday afternoon is the Dark Ages of the internet, after all. But here are some stories about things beery that could colour how you look at the world this weekend. How could I not share?

    • Brian Stechschulte of San Fran has confirmed on Twitter that DRAFT magazine has agreed to pay for the photo of his which they poached and published. You will recall that BeerAdvocate nicked on of my shots but discussions that followed never included the weird wacko assertions from DRAFT that they had a right to lift and pocket the copyrighted works of others.

    Boston Beer has decided to use the hammer of the law against another brewer 1/20th of its size. Next time you hear their TV ads squeek on and on about the magical craft of brewing ask yourself why he also does not know about the corresponding code. Handle this in the locker room, Jim. It's not like you are actually going to have a trial, are you?

    • In happier news, I am drinking my first Fuller's Past Masters XX Strong Ale as I type. While 49 weeks from release to the shelves of the world's biggest booze buyer is a great example of my LCBO love / hate. Most importantly, a big +1 to Ron who helped recreate this 1891 brew. It's got a gorgeous aroma of malt marmalade that explodes in the mouth on the first sip. Fabulous value at $3.75 for a 7.9% classic. And it does make you wonder what the hell a "XXXX" would have meant to the drinker of over 100 years ago.

    • And even more interesting than that is what I am reading about in Fish into Wine: The Newfoundland Plantation in the Seventeenth Century. It is clear from the book that there was brewing in the early Newfoundland plantations of the early 1600s but also that there was a thriving drinks trade to the workers on this shore. These first "masterless men" lived without direct oversight in a massively lucrative trade that needed their existence. But before the plantations, there were generations of West Country English fishermen back into the mid-1500s who arrived in May and left in September, ships arriving throughout their annual stay to pick up salt cod to deliver to southern Europe. These men must have brewed ale as part of their daily routine. Just a guess so far but they must have packed a barrel or two of malt to get them through the summer.

    There. The good, the bad and the ugly of today's news in beer. You decide which is which.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/12/Alberta__Loaded_Goat__Alley_Kat_Brewing__Edmonton'

    Alberta: Loaded Goat, Alley Kat Brewing, Edmonton

    Posted: November 12th, 2011, 1:42am CET by Alan McLeod

    There are not many things fun about getting pneumonia but gifties left at the door are among them. This was delivered last week as a gifting on from someone who brought it from Alberta. It was a special release from last spring but at 7.3% it should still be a fairly safe bet.

    Caramel coloured with a thin white foam and rim, it gives off a nutty sweet aroma. There is an acidic twing to the smell that is either a bit of concerning age or welcome vinousness. I never know what is right, especially with bock. I know that you should be getting a cherry note in doppelbocks - or at least I look for one - but Horst tells me at page 558 that it should be lighter than that. In the mouth, there are very nice nutty brown bread malts, swell sherry notes, maybe a little earthy apple, more twiggy than steely hops and a nod to smoke. Sweet and rich but not overly heavy. It's a fine drink but not sure how much if any of that tang was caused by the extra six months. On the other hand, who cares?

    Great respect from the BAers.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/11/Book_Review__Great_British_Pubs__Adrian_Tierney_Jones'

    Book Review: Great British Pubs, Adrian Tierney-Jones

    Posted: November 11th, 2011, 3:17am CET by Alan McLeod

    I have to say that this book is a bit of a shock. I never knew you could mix so much porn with this degree of authoritative statement. How does one react? I have learned things I will share... yet I have wallowed in the depths of my deepest private imagination. AJT is good. He's like a pusher. He's feeding me what I want in the way that I want it - and not necessarily in a way that suits my best interests. As I was reading this just now I was imagining how we might place the kids - the five kids - and just take off for a week to cross an ocean to hang out, you know, in British pubs.

    What else can I say? The book is a collection of, say, six to 14 pubs arranged in "best of" themes. Best of heritage pubs. Best of seaside pubs. 22 or so categories. Reasonable layout and mapping as we saw with the Edinburgh guide. And then those descriptions. These pubs are either simply compelling in their own right or AJT makes them so in the brief entry that accompanies each entry. Consider the entry for The Bell at page 118 in Saffron Walden in Essex, included in the best just off the motorway category. The Elizabethan property includes several acres of walking space. That makes me want to go there - even if I am not on a long highway drive passing by. And what about The King's Head in Laxfield, visited by our pal Paul back in 2007. Paul gave us a great picture in words and photos of the place including the open room in the back where you get the beer instead of anything like a bar. Adrian tells us what it is like to walk through the place looking for the beer room. Gorgeous. And there are so many more descriptions of the sorts of bars you want to sit in, soak in. Be in. There's even Jeff and The Gunmakers there on page 69 (dude!) I miss Stonch. Have I mentioned that?

    Summing up? Bought this myself. Not a review copy. It's the Christmas pressie you want. Big time. Buy it.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/09/I_Think_I_Asked_Joe__How_Do_We_Value_Beer_Pr0n__'

    I Think I Asked Joe "How Do We Value Beer Pr0n?"

    Posted: November 9th, 2011, 5:47pm CET by Alan McLeod

    Joe had a good post this week about Chuck Cook self-publishing some information and photos he had gathered about Brasserie Dupont - and then putting being a click-through payment button offering access for $4.99. It is at the upper right at Chuck's blog if you want to go check it out. Joe suggested "[o]f course, you could always download the material and start emailing it around and sharing it on the Internet for free. If you're a douchebag." For me, this smacked of something I could not put my finger on. I had some odd reactions to this which I thought deserved a reasonably reasonable exploration:

    → I am all for making a buck off beer information. I run ads all over this site and they bring in money. Not enough frankly. Not because these post are dribbles of pure gold but because I can. I am offered the ads and do not go out and search for them. I trust they are worth what I am offered.

    → On the one hand, I had a photo ripped off by BeerAdvocate - not even a very good one, just a rare-ish bottle. I was still ticked and am ticked when I see DRAFT magazine doing the same recently.

    → On the other, I think I have noticed in the past that Chuck sometimes uses watermarks on his images which, if my recollection is true, bugs the hell out of me. But I don't know why. I am not a open source "free beer" phony baloney, was quoted about that - and went on and on. Yet there is something in any topical writing that is about sharing amongst the hopefully widening circle - something beer writing is laden with. A watermark hisses with "my pretty, my pretty".

    → When I see someone calling themselves "the world's top beer writer", a "leading exponent". "one of the world's foremost authorities" or otherwise draw their own conclusions about their place it gives me a fur ball that I just can't gak up. Note: Chuck does not do this on his site. He only notes his actual experience and does not award himself any gold star in summation.

    What is wrong with me? I have moaned about there not being money in beer writing for years... best part of a decade if I checked. Maybe if the article were put up to auction and its value assessed would the marketplace of ideas be at play. Maybe if there was a process of reporting back, evidence that (as I wish) he gets 2,000 downloads and makes a pretty penny. But just placing a tag on something and for that tag to instantly become the ethical standard? I just don't get that.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/08/That_Odd_Tension__Wishing_To_Find_Any_Answer_But_Beer'

    That Odd Tension: Wishing To Find Any Answer But Beer

    Posted: November 8th, 2011, 2:56am CET by Alan McLeod

    That's footnote 27 at page 134 of New Sweden in America which is exhibiting something between a quibble and a theme. It's actually in a chapter in that book, "Lenape Maize Sales to the Swedish Colonists: Cultural Stability during the Early Colonial Period" by Marshall Joseph Becker in which there is a lot of very interesting stuff. For example, in 1654, there was an effort to expand trade products with the Lenape, the local nation, from mainly corn to hops as well. Like the colony, it was a flop but who knew the colonial Swedes were gathering hops in the mid-17th century Delaware. There's more. In another document, the same Becker shows that New Sweden's outpost at Tinicum Island had a brewhouse: warning pgf and elsewhere we read that

    Swedish women in Delaware made beer not only from pompions (pumpkins) and corn but persimmons and watermelons.

    So, with all that evidence that there was plenty of beer and brewing in colonial New Sweden during its existence from 1638 to 1660 why is there a suspicion that the brew kettle was being used for something other than producing beer? I haven't cataloged it but, just like a Shakespeare play presented in Victorian accent, there seems to be a tension over time, in this case a presumption that beer was not as pervasive in northern western culture prior to a certain point in industrialization as we also seem to know it was. It may be that we don't want to know or that we can't take on just how much was drunk by how many. The more I read about these earlier points, however, the more I think I should be surprised to find a sober official, a dry town.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/07/Toronto_s_York_Brewery_And_Playter_s_Tavern_1801_05'

    Toronto's York Brewery And Playter's Tavern 1801-05

    Posted: November 7th, 2011, 2:15am CET by Alan McLeod

    I have been playing around with some passages on Toronto in the first years of the 19th century. Here is what I started with:

    ⇒ "A recent Fact will corroborate what I have said; A Brewer from Kingston removed to York lately and, on application to the Governor, obtained one of the King's vessels to transport wheat and other Grain from Kingston and the Bay of Quintie, before beer coud be made - and almost all the Pork, Beer, Butter, Flour, Hams, Mutton, which are used at York are brought by water, from Kingston, Niagara, the Genesee Counttry, &c &c. - In short the Town is supported by the money which the Gentlemen who have Salaries from Government expend in Buildings & other Improvements; and that source begins to fail.": Letter, Rev John Stuart to the Bishop of Nova Scotia, Kingston, September 14, 1801.

    ⇒ "Even in 1815, after the establishment of two neighbourhood breweries, Commissariat General Robinson was obliged to buy 8,347 gallons of beer and liquors from Kingston for the men at the cost of L8,800": Bowering, page 9.

    ⇒ "York Brewery, southeast corner of Duchess and Sherbourne (Caroline) Streets, 1800-1805. Just when the first commercial brewery in York, and who the brewmaster was may never be known... This brewery may have been operated by Robert Henderson in a notice of sale dated 1809, Henderson advertised a milling plant, brewhouse, working tubs, coolers, two kilns for drying malt, two good wells or water, a stable," two stills, a townhouse, slaughterhouse and three acres of land": Bowering, page 91.

    ⇒ "1805 - Upper Canada - Robert Henderson establishes York's (Toronto's) first brewery. It closed 12 years later and the facility was leased by different brewers until 1853": Sneath, page 329.

    So you see there is some question as to when a brewery was first built in Toronto - or what was then York... but then I also remembered In Mixed Company by Roberts and how there was a chapter about an early tavern keeper who kept a diary. Turns out it was written in 1802-02 and turns out she gives the address for the tavern - the corner of King and Caroline Streets. Which made me look up above again and see that Bowering gave an address as well.

    Over time Duchess is now Richmond and Caroline did become Sherbourne but that is enough to dip into the City of Toronto's historical maps and atlases online collection and - voila. We have the information above. Which also means we can figure out where these spots are today which you will see if you click on that little thumbnail.

    Roberts explains that the Toronto of Playter's diary and the founding of its first brewery had 75 to 100 homes and about 320 inhabitants in town, about 420 in the surrounding country as well as about 240 in the military garrison to the west. Both establishments sit in what is even then called Old Town. It's the administrative capital of the new colony of Upper Canada. Roberts also indicates that drinking in Playter's included rum, "sling" and punch as well as whiskey, brandy and wine. No beer is mentioned that I see.

    I would love to have a read of the diary but, if we think of that letter from Rev. Stuart above, we might quess that early York is something of a Brasilia, a constructed government town. The kind of place that you had wine over beer. Not Stuart's sort of place. No, he was a beer man. One of the founders of my town, his beer tankard is now owned by the people of Canada. He may well have had many an ale from Albany in it. He was a personal pal of Sir William Johnson, both backwoods leaders in central New York before the Revolution, home of our loyalists, beer drinkers there and in what becomes Ontario a decade before the colonial softie government officials show up in York.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/05/Session_57__Of_Vom_And_Corn__More_And_Waugh'

    Session 57: Of Vom And Corn, More And Waugh

    Posted: November 5th, 2011, 8:00pm CET by Alan McLeod

    Steve Lamond has stepped up to host this month's edition of The Session and posed the following to us all under the title "Beery Confessions: Guilty Secrets/Guilty Pleasure Beer":

    I'd like to know your beery guilty secrets. Did you have a particularly embarrassing first beer (in the same way that some people purchase an atrocious song as their first record) or perhaps there's still a beer you return to even though you know you shouldn't? Or maybe you don't subscribe to the baloney about feeling guilty about beers and drink anything anyway? You're also welcome to write about bad drinking experiences you've had as a result of your own indulgence or times when you've been completely wrong about a beer but not yet confessed to anyone that you've changed your mind.

    Beer guilt. A friend describes that as part of the hangover, the wriggling creeping feeling on your skin that smacks of wasted money, regret for words said which should never have been said, embarrassment at suggestions which would have been better left in the imagination. Not that I know any of that. I have very fond recollections of the timely, well-placed vom - like that of the pal who seemed to make the event seem charming, saying things like "excuse me for one minute" as he unloaded right there in the line up to get in some club well after midnight, not a speck hitting dress or shoe. The moment still reminds me of that great thought of Sir Thomas More in his 1516 book Utopia at page 113 of this edition:

    The pleasure of the bodye they devide into ii. partes. The first is when delectation is sensibly felt and perceaved. Whiche many times chaunceth by the renewing and refreshing of those partes, whiche oure naturall heate drieth up. This commeth by meate and drynke. And sometymes whyles those thynges be expulsed, and voyded, wherof is in the body ouer great abundaunce. This pleasure is felt, when we do our natural easement, or when we be doyng the acte of generation, or when the ytchinge of any part is eased with rubbyng or scratchynge...

    But there are higher pleasures and higher orders of guilt that are laid upon them. Without defining all the hierarchies involved, suffice it to say that one such pleasure of mine is beer made with corn. I might be lonely in this love but, with respect, I find the defamation of one plant over another in the minds of beer nerds more than odd. I find it close minded. Fortunately, there are a few great brewers who, like me, stand up for corn. Whether it's Spotted Cow by Wisconcin's New Glarus or Utica Club by New York's F.X. Matt, corn can be made a pleasure through skill. Yet, read the reviews. You know they are out there. "Boiled corn" is down there is "cardboard" at the depths of descriptors. Should I feel guilt for this? I will not.

    Think about it. We can be "should nots" we beer fans. Believing that there are reasons to never try something, that such pleasures are below us. Isn't it better to sometimes have the regret of "shouldn't have"? Better to have taken on the Utica Club in fine style and then learn, perhaps, regret. Too low you will say to yourself... but remember this. Remember how Evelyn Waugh describes the end to an upper class drinking session in 1923 at Oxford near the beginning of Brideshead Revisited:

    It was not unusual for dinner parties to end in that way; there was in fact a recognized tariff on such occasions for the comfort of the scout; we were all learning, by trial and error, to carry our wine. There was also a kind of insane and endearing orderliness about Sebastian’s choice, in his extremity, of an open window. But, when all is said, it remained an unpropitious meeting. His friends bore him to the gate and, in a few minutes, his host, an amiable Etonian of my year, returned to apologize. He, too, was tipsy and his explanations were repetitive and, towards the end, tearful. “The wines were too various,” he said; “it was neither the quality nor the quantity that was at fault. It was the mixture. Grasp that and you have the root of the matter. To understand all is to forgive all.”

    Which is the higher and which the lower? That is my question to you.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/03/Was_This_The_Earliest_Brewing_In_English_Canada_'

    Was This The Earliest Brewing In English Canada?

    Posted: November 3rd, 2011, 8:35pm CET by Alan McLeod

    Sneath, Pashley and Rubin all mention the 1600s brewers of New France - Hebert (1617), Ambroise (1646) and Talon (1670). But I just came across this reference in a footnote in the Minutes of the Hudson's Bay Company, 1671-1674, published by Toronto's Champlain Society in 1942, describing payments being made on 16 February 1674 for goods supplied to the ships of the Hudson Bay company:

    John Raymond, "By Severall quantities of Ship Beere at 40s p. Tonn Strong beere at 12s, 9d a barrell & Harbor Beere at 6s 6d p. barrell with Malt & Hopps dd. Capt. Gillam, Morris and Cole", £ 79.

    A few months later, a committee of the Hudson Bay Company on 6 July 1674 directed payment to the same John Raymond £ 30 on account of ""Beer and Malt. dd. on board the Prince Rupert." These items appear among a long list of payments for other necessary goods for taking aboard the ships Prince Rupert, Messenger and Employ. You will see in footnote 2 to this post on a blog by Norma Hall subtitled "Northern Arc: the Significance of Seafaring to Western Canadian History" that these three ships were sailing between England and Hudson Bay in the first half of the 1670s. The Prince Rupert and Messenger, at least, over wintered.

    There are loads of interesting questions and observations from these passages from the Minutes of the Hudson's Bay Company, 1671-1674 including why are they shipping malt and hops separate from barrels of beer. If these ships overwintered and carried malt and hops it is pretty obvious that they must have been brewing. We know the British brewed on ships in the Arctic in 1852 so why not in 1674? But also - what is "harbor beer"? It costs about half of "strong beer" and we know from Gate's work on Kingston that in 1825 "small or ship beer" was being sold in Kingston. But most of all the question is this - was this the first brewing of beer in English Canada? Or did other earlier over wintering ships brew, too?

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/03/Book_Review__The_Art_And_Mystery_Of_Brewing_in_Ontario'

    Book Review: The Art And Mystery Of Brewing in Ontario

    Posted: November 3rd, 2011, 3:49pm CET by Alan McLeod

    While I stand by my statement:

    "...brewing history can be a tool or route to understanding for some but is ultimately unimportant if you do not need to tap into it..."

    ... I have to admit that I do like dabbling in it - as long as I stay within the reach of my own capabilities. I especially like dabbling in it care of a stack of bedside books when I am, like today, on the third day of the treatment for a blip of pneumonia. And good thing, too, as it's not like the weeks of cough medications leading to this stage have left me longing for a tart gueuze. But, while we are at it, would it kill big pharmacy to make a expectorant that tastes like an imperial stout?

    Anyway, one of the books recently added to the pile is 1988's The Art And Mystery Of Brewing in Ontario by Ian Bowering. We suffer in Canada from a lack of understanding of ourselves and no where more than here in Ontario. Atlantic Canadians, Quebeckers and Western Canadians all are rightly proud of themselves even if it is largely based on how they have each been screwed in their own special way by that place to stand, place to grow, Ontar-i-ar-i-ar-i-o.

    Bowering's book helps with Ontario's blandness. It sits in an important place with others on brewing in Canada and does one thing particularly well. It lists the breweries by town. Simple thing but it shows that brewing advanced across the province as the population advanced westerly from the early 1790s or before in eastern Kingston to the late 1890s in Rat Portage, over 2,000 km to the NW. It also shows that brewing was going on at a far larger scale, unexpected industrialization with far greater distribution earlier on than some might suggest. Brains Brewery in rural 1834 was producing 100 barrels a week. Lager was being made in Kitchener well before 1850 and even wee Huether Crystal Springs in little Neustadt delivered in a 70 km radius a few year later.

    Information will advance and it is evident more information has come to light when we compare the listings for Kingston and compare them to the brand new book The Breweries of Kingston and The St. Lawrence Valley by Steve Gates which follows a similar structure. But as one wag recently stated:

    ...that there are others out there who will identify errata and offer corrections is something which will ultimately contribute to the further development and maturation of this particular field of study.

    I might add that it is the only way it will further develop and mature. And not only through peer review and correction but building on the shoulders of others who have gone before. So Gates cites Bowering, Sneath cites Bowering, Mr. B cites Bowering, Pashley cites Mr. B and Sneath. It's the way things work, the way we build the collective body of knowledge - if, that is, we are actually interested in presenting what actually was.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/02/Black_Sheep_Brewery_And_The_Two_Fat_Ladies'

    Black Sheep Brewery And The Two Fat Ladies

    Posted: November 2nd, 2011, 2:33am CET by Alan McLeod

    I have a soft spot for Yorkshire's Black Sheep Brewery as it is one of the brands imported from time to time by the LCBO for over a decade. It's dependable, tasty ale. Good to hear, then, that they are moving ahead with getting ahead:

    The company is also trialling Black Sheep in a can in Tesco stores to appeal to new customers. “It offers people opportunities to drink Black Sheep in different scenarios, such as outdoors and parties,” Mr Theakston said. He told the Yorkshire Post that he was looking to push exports in North America, Canada and Scandinavia over the next year. The company already exports all over the world but in small quantities. “The domestic market is tough so export is an exciting possibility moving forward,” he said.

    I hope we see those tins over here, too, as there is nothing the LCBO like more than a wall cooler of 500 ml cans. Not sure, however, how the Two Fat Ladies would take to a can. I have the complete DVD set as well as a couple of the books as they are the best source for practical Edwardian great house retro cooking. Kind of thing Great-Grannie, she who ran a great house before WWI, would have specialized in. Even if the ladies come across more like her daughter, my great aunt Madge, who was a tough head nurse in the front line of the North Africa campaign against Rommel. If you wait until the end of the clip above, right after the making of the deviled kidneys, you will see a few shots at the brewery in 1997 where they took their dishes to serve the brewers. More from the first half of the episode as well.

    Guilty pleasures? Hardly. Two Fat Ladies? Black Sheep? That's just common sense. But those other sorts, those sins of commission are what's up on Friday night as Steve steps in for Pete to host the 57th episode of The Session on the topic of your guilty pleasure beers.

  • Permalink for 'A_Good_Beer_Blog/2011/11/01/And_Quiet_Flows_the_OCBeerCommentary_Wiki'

    And Quiet Flows the OCBeerCommentary Wiki

    Posted: November 1st, 2011, 3:15am CET by Alan McLeod

    Well, I didn't expect to be called out - or, rather, have my suspicions confirmed - by the east coast media establishment. I did say that I expect this to be a slow project from day one. Nonetheless, Clay Risen's observations at The Atlantic today on the state of beer writing are well worth reading, including these:

    Newcomers to wine can follow a reliable guide like Asimov or the Wall Street Journal's Lettie Teague; good luck finding their equivalents (i.e., deeply knowledgeable but layman-accessible) in the world of beer...

    Such absences would matter more if the book pretended to objective universality; as a companion guided by Oliver's subjective perspective, their absences are points for debate...

    The Wiki has only about 40 entries, and most of them deal with matters of interpretation. In a book that may have upwards of 100,000 factual statements in it, the presence of a few dozen errors, while regrettable, is pretty impressive...

    It's a shame that would-be critics have spent their entire time fact-checking the precise rules of the Royal Court's brewing guidelines under Henry VIII (subject of one catch), because they've overlooked the achievement of the book as a whole -- though, given their vehemence, it's a good bet they weren't going to give it a chance in any case. Thoroughly illustrated and beautifully typeset, the book is precisely what a companion should be: an engaging, subjective, erudite guide to the interested novice and, at the same time, a quick reference for the initiated...

    Secret: one of my reasons for setting up the wiki was the suspicion that my concern with the date that lager beer was introduced to Canada was a blip. Fortunately, the wiki is intended - can only be intended - to give the book more than a chance. It's a way of examining the text but it will take a lot of time. Feel for poor Stan who almost lost his marbles just working his way to the entry for "Thomas Jefferson" in order to start filling in the Index to Entries by Author. I have started to load his efforts... but that will take time, too. Might get done by Christmas.

    This pace in turn is giving me more patience with the book. Oxford University Press chose my "throwing the book against the wall" sentence for their marketing but I might have been too rash. Garrett indicated in an email when we discussed the wiki that there was a chance for small corrections or additions between printings and that the wiki might be useful for that. I hope it is. Criticism can be useful. Even for those books in those subject areas of the library or the shop... or Amazon, I suppose... where not enough, as Risen suggests, has yet been written.