Feeds

5373 items (5373 unread) in 17 feeds

Breweries Breweries
Bloggers Bloggers
Craftbrewers Craftbrewers

The Brew Site (23 unread)

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/30/CDA_Week__Oakshire_O%e2%80%99Dark_30'

    CDA Week: Oakshire O’Dark:30

    Posted: April 30th, 2010, 6:00pm CEST by Jon

    Cascadian Dark Ale WeekOakshire Brewing over in Eugene (Oregon) is one of those breweries that has come out of nowhere over the past year or two and has been taking the Oregon beer scene by storm. They won the silver medal at this past year’s GABF in the coffee flavored beer category for their Overcast Espresso Stout, and their Watershed IPA seems to be a fan favorite. So brewing up a Cascadian Dark Ale makes perfect sense.

    Hence, O’Dark:30, the CDA with possibly the most creative/interesting name I’ve yet seen (if not a little odd). It’s slightly lighter in alcohol than the others I’ve reviewed—6.3% by volume—but that’s plenty when it comes in 22-ounce bottles. They talk about it on their website as their spring seasonal, so that might mean we’ll see this beer show up annually.

    Oakshire O'Dark:30 Cascadian Dark AleAppearance: Murky brown-black with tan wood putty head. No light is seen when held up to the light.

    Smell: Coffee, chocolate, licorice; hops are taking a backseat in the nose in favor of the cocoa malts.

    Taste: Hops show up here; clean and bitter and a little peppery. The middle is where the dark malts play, also a bit bitter like deeply roasted coffee, then the hops reassert themselves at the back. Almost no “C” hop citrus or fruitiness, though.

    Mouthfeel: Pleasantly medium-bodied with nice creamy texture. Clean bitter finish.

    Overall: Surprisingly chocolate quality to it, and also surprising that there’s almost no hop aroma. I think it plays really well on the tongue, however.

    On BeerAdvocate so far it’s scored an overall grade of B. On RateBeer it scores 3.55 out of 5 and is in their 85th percentile.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/30/CDA_Week__Deschutes_Hop_in_the_Dark'

    CDA Week: Deschutes Hop in the Dark

    Posted: April 30th, 2010, 3:32am CEST by Jon

    Cascadian Dark Ale WeekDeschutes Brewery is soon to be releasing their own Cascadian Dark Ale soon (in May): Hop in the Dark. I previously posted about it back in March.

    “We’ve brewed 22 batches of this beer at both our Bend and Portland pubs, experimenting on our customers as we perfected the recipe,” said Brewmaster Larry Sidor. “This beer has subtle coffee undertones born from a blend of oats with dark, Munich and crystal malts. Classic IPA flavors and aromas are due to courageous additions of Cascade, Citra and Centennial hops.”

    Deschutes Hop in the Dark CDAThe bottles haven’t hit the shelves yet (nor sent out to bloggers yet), but Deschutes does have Hop in the Dark on tap at their pubs, and while I don’t have a full review, I’ve at least tasted it. But more on that in a minute.

    I noticed something interesting on their website that I think highlights the (even now) experimental nature of this beer: the press release listed Hop in the Dark as having 6.5% alcohol by volume and 70 IBUs. The page on the site lists 6.5% and 75 IBUs. However, if you look at the “What’s on Tap” pages for the Bend and Portland pubs, you’ll see that in Bend the “pub exclusive” version has 6.7% and 93 IBUs, while in Portland it’s listed at 6.7% and 60 IBUs.

    What are the official numbers? Ultimately the “official” version for most people will be what comes out of the bottle, so it’s a bit of a moot point. I just think this is a great example of the, er, fluid nature of beer and brewing: ultimately, no two glasses of beer are exactly alike.

    As for the version I’ve tasted at the Bend pub: likely the one with 93 IBUs, because I found it to be pretty intensely bitter, full of resin and pine pitch and similar tarry character, much like the W’10 I reviewed earlier this week, only cranked even higher and overall (I think) a bit thicker in the mouth.

    It’ll be interesting to see if the bottled version is similar.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/28/CDA_Week__HUB_Secession_Black_IPA'

    CDA Week: HUB Secession Black IPA

    Posted: April 28th, 2010, 9:57pm CEST by Jon

    Cascadian Dark Ale WeekHopworks Urban Brewery in Portland released their own interpretation of the Cascadian Dark Ale this year: Secession Black IPA. Like all of HUB’s beers, it’s brewed with all organic ingredients.

    It’s 6.5% alcohol by volume and I have to say, I really like the silkscreened label design they have for this bottle. With both the Douglas Fir silhouette (the same used in the Cascadia flag that I’m using for the logo on the right) and the map of the “Republic of Cascadia” paying homage to the style’s name (despite the “Black India Pale Ale” also on the label), it’s an attractive, eye-catching design.

    HUB Secession Black IPAAppearance: Very deep red-brown with a generous two-to-three fingers of rocky thick head.

    Smell: Coffee-roasted notes with green, earthy hops—almost minty, with a bit of fresh cut grass.

    Taste: On the tongue it’s kind of like a hoppy Brown Ale; a bit of a sweet malt note along with dark chocolate, and big hops that are less bitter and more flavorful with notes of mint, earth, resin, and are floral with some fruity notes. Sweetish roasted malts in the back, and some bitterness hits the back of the palate, too.

    Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied and fairly smooth with a silky, creamy mouthfeel.

    Overall: Interesting how the hops are less bitter but still intensely flavorful—like what Deschutes Brewery has been doing lately. Nicely done.

    On BeerAdvocate, it scores an overall grade of A. On RateBeer, it scores 3.67 out of 5 and is in their 89th percentile.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/28/CDA_Week__The_style__the_name'

    CDA Week: The style, the name

    Posted: April 28th, 2010, 6:00pm CEST by Jon

    Cascadian Dark Ale WeekSo some of you might be wondering, “Just what is this ‘Cascadian Dark Ale’ anyway?” Well, there’s a couple of ways to answer this. First, let’s get an overview of the style… although that gets into the name issue as well.

    In a soundbite, the style is a “Black IPA” (forget for a moment that “IPA” is short for India Pale Ale). Think of taking something like a Schwarzbier or a Porter and hopping it to American IPA levels… or conversely, taking an American IPA and adding dark malts for the color and roasty/chocolate flavors.

    It’s a fairly new style—brewers have only been producing it commercially for the past several years—but interestingly, for such a new (young) style, it was this year “officially” noted as a style by the Brewers Association guidelines:

    American-style India black ale has medium high to high hop bitterness, flavor and aroma with medium-high alcohol content, balanced with a medium body. The style is further characterized by a moderate degree of caramel malt character and medium to strong dark roasted malt flavor and aroma. High astringency and high degree of burnt roast malt character should be absent. Fruity, floral and herbal character from hops of all origins may contribute to aroma and flavor.
    Original Gravity (ºPlato) 1.056-1.075 (14-18.2 ºPlato) ● Apparent Extract/Final Gravity (ºPlato) 1.012-1.018 (3-4.5 ºPlato) ● Alcohol by Weight (Volume) 5-6% (6 -7.5%) ● Bitterness (IBU) 50-70 ● Color SRM (EBC) 25+ (50+ EBC)

    The trick to the style is getting the dark malts and the copious amounts of hops to essentially not clash—no easy feat considering the high degree of astringency and burnt characters that many roasted malts exhibit do not pair well with strong hops. It’s a balancing act that’s tricky to get right, as Deschutes Brewery can attest—they experimented with something like 22 recipes before settling on their interpretation of the style coming out soon (their Hop in the Dark CDA).

    So what about this name? Black IPA? India Black Ale? Cascadian Dark Ale? There’s a movement here in the Pacific Northwest to name the style—you guessed it—the latter, for reasons other bloggers have already enumerated much better than I could myself: Lisa Morrison published a well-rounded article highlighting the issues, and Ezra over at The New School put forth a persuasive article advocating the CDA name not long ago as well.

    The gist: “Black IPA” is an oxymoron, “India Black Ale” only makes sense in the context of IPA (and “IBA” and “IPA” might be confusingly similar when spoken aloud), and “Cascadian Dark Ale” best describes the beer in context of it’s style and where it has been really taking off (as well as a tip of the hat to the prototypical American hop, Cascade, which is what a lot of American IPAs were built on).

    Obviously I’m in the “Cascadian” camp, but I’m certainly not above going with the other names if it helps get a point across.

    Though I don’t know that I would go with the Brewers Association guidelines name of “American-Style India Black Ale”; doesn’t that imply that there is a non-American style of India Black Ale?

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/27/CDA_Week__Three_Creeks_8_Second_IBA__mini_review_'

    CDA Week: Three Creeks 8 Second IBA (mini review)

    Posted: April 27th, 2010, 6:00pm CEST by Jon

    Cascadian Dark Ale WeekThis past weekend, we traveled over to Sisters to have lunch at Three Creeks Brewing and thinking of CDA Week, one of the beers I ordered was the 8 Second IBA (India Black Ale). This was one of their first beers on tap when they opened (and was the first CDA style of beer that I know of brewed in Central Oregon) and is described on their website thusly:

    This unique style is truly an original creation. Dave started with a big IPA, darkened up the malt package on a whim and went crazy adding more than 2 lbs of hops per barrel. This dark, bullish creation is sure to please anyone that’s willing to ride.

    I first (and last) tried 8 Second when I first reviewed Three Creeks, back in 2008. Here’s my one line note from then:

    8 Second IBA: “India Black Ale”—Good, unusual. More “black” than an IPA in body (i.e. lighter/thinner), but nicely hoppy and worth another look whenever I go back. 6.6% ABV.

    The previous time (or two?) we’d been back before this weekend, I want to say the 8 Second had been removed from the regular lineup, so this weekend it was on as a seasonal/specialty beer. Which was serendipitous. However, I only wrote (another) one-line review:

    More chocolatey and fruity with clean bitter profile. (Brown with hops)

    Helpful, huh? It’s a well-done beer but not as intense as Widmer’s Pitch Black IPA, with more of a rounder, smoother flavor profile.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/26/CDA_Week__W%e2%80%9910_Pitch_Black_IPA'

    CDA Week: W’10 Pitch Black IPA

    Posted: April 26th, 2010, 10:00pm CEST by Jon

    Cascadian Dark Ale WeekWidmer pitched their hat into the Cascadian Dark Ale arena this year with their W’10 Pitch Black IPA (this year’s Brewmasters’ Release). Somewhat confusingly, they gave the beer the “Black IPA” moniker but give credit to the Cascadian Dark style on their page for the W series:

    Pitch Black IPA is a Pacific Northwest twisted tribute to an IPA style of beer. It is almost a traditional IPA but it is instead brewed to the emerging style of Cascadian Dark. We add a modest amount of a specially made debittered black malt to give this IPA a very dark color but without the characteristic dark malt flavors. Pitch Black IPA is hopped generously in the brewhouse and then again later during the dry hopping process.

    So Widmer’s naming of this as a “Black IPA” while giving tribute to the “Cascadian Dark” style is essentially a marketing choice: more people will see “Pitch Black IPA” and will possibly be more inclined to buy (the familiarity and comfort of the “IPA” label). It’s 6.5% alcohol by volume.

    Widmer W'10 Pitch Black IPAAppearance: Very dark cola brown, deep garnet red when held to the light. Cappuccino foam head.

    Smell: Curious mix of American citrusy hops and brown, chocolatey malts. Not as fragrantly hoppy as a regular IPA.

    Taste: Roasted malts and piney hops, which combine to give it a pitch-y quality, almost a tar note. Dark brown malts lend a dry character, and the otherwise citrus-American hops exhibit none of that fruity quality here—very bitter.

    Mouthfeel: Medium-full-bodied with dry thick finish.

    Overall: Pitchy, bitter, dark and roasty but not porter-roasty; unusual but good—though (like the style) it may take some getting used to.

    On BeerAdvocate, it scores an overall grade of B+. On RateBeer, it scores 3.5 out of 5 and is in their 93rd percentile.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/26/Cascadian_Dark_Ale__CDA__Week'

    Cascadian Dark Ale (CDA) Week

    Posted: April 26th, 2010, 6:00pm CEST by Jon

    Cascadian Dark Ale WeekWelcome to Theme Week for April 2010! For this week I decided to focus on the (somewhat disputed) new beer style of Cascadian Dark Ale—although if you find that name confusing, then it’s entirely possible you’ve heard the alternative name of Black IPA, or even India Black Ale.

    And if you haven’t heard of any of those, then this should be an interesting week for you!

    The short, quick primer for the Cascadian Dark Ale (CDA) is this: think of an American IPA, only instead of pale it’s dark brown to black, like a roasty Porter or Schwarzbier. In other words, very much a “black IPA.”

    You’ll notice that I laid out three possible names for this new style; unsurprisingly, the naming issue is the main area of dispute among the beer geeks and it should be obvious where I stand as far as the name goes. So this week in addition to reviewing a number of these new black beers, I’ll dig into the style definition and the naming dispute a bit as well.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/25/Hop_Press__Indigenous_American_beer_styles'

    Hop Press: Indigenous American beer styles

    Posted: April 25th, 2010, 12:45am CEST by Jon

    My article today on Hop Press: Indigenous American beer styles: an overview of the beer styles that have developed, or are still emerging, that are uniquely American in origin. I’ve spent some time writing about these beers at length here—particularly Cream Ales, fresh hop beers, and pumpkin beers—so it should come as no surprise for regular readers to know I have an affinity for the American styles.

    One style that didn’t make my overview but cropped up in comments: Coffee beers (particularly Stouts and Porters). Do they qualify as a uniquely American style? I’m not sure, but I think it’s worth discussing.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/23/7_Eleven_Game_Day'

    7-Eleven Game Day

    Posted: April 23rd, 2010, 7:53am CEST by Jon

    One of the (stranger) beer news stories that’s making the rounds this week is how 7-Eleven is going to sell its own private label beer, “Game Day.” (Gotta love MSNBC’s headline for the story—”It pairs with microwave burritos”!) It’ll be canned, of course.

    Game Day comes in two varieties. Game Day Light is 3.9 percent alcohol by volume and 110 calories per 12 ounces. Game Day Ice is 5.5 percent alcohol and 155 calories. The price is between $6.99 and $8.99 for a 12-pack, depending on local taxes and distribution costs, and 24-ounce singles are available for between $1.49 and $1.89.

    The beer is being made by the 150-year-old City Brewery in La Crosse, Wis., one of the country’s largest contract brewers.

    With names like “Light” and “Ice” it’s pretty clear what market segment they’re going after. But, I’d still try both just to see.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/21/Deschutes_Twilight_Ale__2010_'

    Deschutes Twilight Ale (2010)

    Posted: April 21st, 2010, 6:00pm CEST by Jon

    Twilight AleDespite my reservations about how early Twilight Ale showed up this year, I had to drink it anyway. It’s too good a beer not to drink; I daresay Twilight Ale is Deschutes Brewery’s most consistently-brewed seasonal beer, and I’m frankly amazed at how consistent my experience has been with it year after year, including this year (previous reviews here, here, and here).

    In the glass, this is a good-looking beer: honey-copper colored and a generous, off-white head and very clear. It leaves a nice light lacing behind as you drink it. On the nose, it’s bready and brightly hoppy with what I’m coming to think of as Deschutes’ signature or “house hop”—(grape)fruity and slightly catty and green.*

    It’s as delicious and drinkable as always, light, crisp and juicy with lots of fresh-baked bread crust and a touch of caramel. The hops really stand out in this beer—nicely floral and pungent on the tongue while the bitterness comes out at the back of the throat like a bitter herb tea.

    Twilight is a standout like it is every year, and most excellent when it’s fresh. It is, quite simply, one of the best summer ales around. It’s in the stores now, so go pick some up.

    And here’s hoping it doesn’t run out too early!

    *(I had to go back and pinpoint the other instances where I’ve detected this hop in their beers; I noted it in the 2009 Hop Henge (“Hops which are green and catty; pink grapefruit(?); sticky, resinous, freshly-crushed hops with a touch of cannabis“) as well as this year’s (“Signature Deschutes hopping (of late); green and resiny and a touch of citrus and a touch catty“), the Red Chair IPA from last year (“smells like the new strain of hops Deschutes has been experimenting with (Hop Henge): floral and citrus and a touch catty“), and other instances. I think Mirror Pond has been exhibiting a bit of this lately as well.)

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/20/Jim_Koch_in_the_Wall_Street_Journal'

    Jim Koch in the Wall Street Journal

    Posted: April 20th, 2010, 8:51am CEST by Jon

    There’s a nice article that appeared today in the Wall Street Journal online: “Revolutionizing American Beer,” being primarily an interview with Jim Koch of Boston Beer Company (brewers of the Sam Adams line of beers). It’s the 25th anniversary of Sam Adams, so it’s apropos, and a good read.

    For example:

    WSJ: Could craft beer ever represent the biggest segment of the industry?

    Mr. Koch: No. I hope not. Because that would mean we dumbed the beer down for volume, and I don’t ever want to see that. I used to say I make beer for 5% of beer drinkers. The reality has always been that 95% of beer drinkers don’t like my beer. Now, that number has probably gone down to 90%. Because most people drink beer for refreshment, and that’s fine. And that’s the domain of the big brewers and they’re great at that.

    Also: a secret project with Weihenstephan.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/20/Oregon_Garden_Brewfest'

    Oregon Garden Brewfest

    Posted: April 20th, 2010, 8:30am CEST by Jon

    The Oregon Garden is located in Silverton, Oregon (outside of Salem), some kind of combination of naturalist gardens, event centers, and resort, and this coming weekend (April 23rd and 24th), it is hosting the Oregon Garden Brewfest as well.

    Join us for the 6th annual Oregon Garden Brewfest. This Oregon craft brewfest will feature many local beer brewers and will offer the chance to sample or enjoy a full glass of a wide variety of specialty beers. There will be live music to dance to and great food.

    It’s $15 admission, which includes the commemorative glass and five tasting tickets (the usual drill). The times are Friday the 23rd from 4pm to 11pm, and Saturday the 24th from noon to 11pm.

    Pretty nice looking lineup of breweries in attendance, including (I think) all of the new(ish) Salem brewers (Pale Horse, Gilgamesh, and Seven Brides).

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/16/Rumbullion_and_other_fermented_beverages'

    Rumbullion and other fermented beverages

    Posted: April 16th, 2010, 9:02am CEST by Jon

    Being interested in beer and brewing, naturally I tend to wonder about the fermentability of various things, and for some reason I was curious as to what fermented molasses is called. Now, I of course know that molasses that has been fermented and then distilled is rum—but I wanted to know what the intermediate stage (the “beer” stage if you will) is called.

    There are of course names for other fermented beverages, based on their (primary) fermentable source:

    • Grain: beer (duh!)
    • Honey: mead
    • Apples: cider
    • Pears: perry
    • Fruit (especially grapes): wine

    After querying Twitter and googling it a bit, I found an answer: a fermented molasses beverage (pre-distilled) is called “rumbullion.” Ironically, I found the answer on this Yahoo! Answers page (the “Other answers” one), and it has some interesting tidbits:

    Next, make sure you are using grade A molasses, not a second or third running. The grade A has a higher sugar content, and leads to a higher alcohol content. The ratio you will want to use is approx. 1:4 molasses to water, etc. (1 pint/quart/gallon of molasses for every 4 pints/quarts/gallons of water) I make an apple rumbullion, and use apple juice instead of the water.

    Don’t use straight molasses, the specific gravity of the fluid is too heavy for the yeast to survive. The ratio above (with apple juice instead of water) gives you a starting gravity of approx. 1.120. This is a potential ABV of about 15.5%, depending on fermentation conditions.

    A final warning, the stuff takes about 3 months to finish fermenting, and is VERY tart for the first 6 months or so after that. You should plan to drink it about 12 months after you start the primary fermentation. It also never completely clears.

    Ultimately I think this is something I’m going to have to try.

    While I was searching, I came across the Wikipedia list of alcoholic beverages which has a number of other interesting ones. For example:

    • Kilju, a Finnish “sugar wine” made from straight sugar (plus water and yeast of course)
    • Kumis (and also kefir), fermented mare’s milk (I’ve heard of this before)
    • Palm wine, made from the sap of various palm trees
    • Tonto, a Ugandan beverage made from bananas

    What about maple syrup? Another quick search seems to reveal it to be called “acer wine” when fermented.

    There’s a lot of homebrewing experiments to be gleaned from the links I’ve posted above.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/13/World_Beer_Cup_Oregon_winners'

    World Beer Cup Oregon winners

    Posted: April 13th, 2010, 8:39am CEST by Jon

    The World Beer Cup was this weekend, and the winners list is posted. For a quick rundown of the stats, though, Jay has a good post that shows Oregon as the #2 state (California is first) in the U.S. (Overall, the U.S. won 204 medals, while Germany came in second with, er, 16.)

    Big congrats to the Oregon winners! Here’s the list:

    • Barley Brown’s Brewpub: Gold for Shredders Wheat, American-Style Wheat Beer
    • Bend Brewing: Gold for Outback X, Strong Ale
    • Caldera Brewing: Gold for Caldera Rauch Ur Bock, Smoked Beer
    • Caldera Brewing: Silver for Caldera Pilot Rock Porter, Brown Porter
    • Deschutes Brewery: Gold for Bachelor Bitter, Special Bitter or Best Bitter
    • Full Sail Brewing: Gold for Session Black, American-Style Dark Lager
    • Hop Valley Brewing: Bronze for DD Blonde, American-Style Wheat Beer
    • Hopworks Urban Brewery: Silver for Organic Velvet ESB, Extra Special Bitter or Strong Bitter
    • Pelican Pub & Brewery: Silver for MacPelican’s Scottish Style Ale, Scottish-Style Ale
    • Rogue Ales: Silver for Smoke Ale, Smoked Beer
    • Upright Brewing: Bronze for Gose, German-Style Sour Ale
    • Widmer: Gold for Drop Top Amber, Ordinary Bitter
    • Widmer: Bronze for ALT, German-Style Brown Ale/Düsseldorf-Style Altbier

    (Listed by brewery, medal, beer, category in case you were wondering.)

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/12/Firestone_Walker_Solace'

    Firestone Walker Solace

    Posted: April 12th, 2010, 6:00pm CEST by Jon

    Firestone Walker SolaceI’m not entirely sure, but I think this new Solace beer from Firestone Walker is breaking new ground for the Paso Robles brewery. (Recall they sent me two bottles to try.) The announcement on their website is calling it a “Summertime Fusion Wheat Beer” and there’s an interesting pull from the press release:

    While Solace is somewhat devoid of style, Brewmaster Matt Brynildson said it will be a sort of unfiltered fusion of a Hefeweizen and a Belgian Saison. Subtle hints of banana and clove aroma will merge with sweet fruit flavor, a medium body and tangy finish. This combination will result in drinkable spring/summer beer with about 6% alcohol by volume.

    “Style guidelines are definitely being stretched and exaggerated with the rise of craft beers in the U.S.,” Brynildson said. “I call it a Summertime Belgo-Bavarian Zwickle Saison,” he added jokingly.

    However you want to define it (I’m going with “unfiltered wheat beer” for now), it sounds fairly ambitious and by and large, I’m pleased with the results.

    Appearance: Hazy spun gold in color with a finely-bubbled, dense white head.

    Smell: Spicy and wheaty; that sour-fruity note of a weizen with a touch of banana. “Spice” is more of a peppercorn than clove.

    Taste: Fresh bread with toasty crust; hints of mango and apple with a peppery presence on the tongue and back of the mouth. Crisp and bright, and there’s a note of floral hops—I think—that comes off more as heather tips or something. Earthy.

    Mouthfeel: Crisp and just light enough to be refreshing but nice bite from the yeast.

    Overall: A touch nutty (sunflower seeds) as it warms; good beer and a little unusual for a wheat (for my expectations), but that’s what they’re shooting for.

    On BeerAdvocate, it already has six reviews and an overall grade of B+. RateBeer also has six ratings, but not enough for a percentile ranking; it currently scores 3.43 out of 5.

    Interestingly, RateBeer is calling the style a “Wheat Ale” while BeerAdvocate is going with “Saison / Farmhouse Ale.” I think they’re both right.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/12/Widmer%e2%80%99s_latest_Brothers%e2%80%99_Reserve__Prickly_Pear_Braggot'

    Widmer’s latest Brothers’ Reserve: Prickly Pear Braggot

    Posted: April 12th, 2010, 8:21am CEST by Jon

    You all remember the Cherry Oak Doppelbock which was the first in Widmer’s new(ish) Brothers’ Reserve series, right? Right. The #2 release is out now, and it’s a doozy:

    Widmer Prickly Pear Braggot

    Prickly Pear Braggot. Our friends Paul and Sandi brought this one over last weekend, and I’m pretty sure it’s the first commercial beer I’ve seen that is a Braggot (also Paul’s contention) and/or is brewed with prickly pear fruit. (A Braggot is essentially half mead, half beer—that is, it’s brewed with roughly equal portions of honey and barley malt.)

    It’s a 10% ABV sipper, with a airy fruit character over a sweet and lightly-hopped body. Definitely interesting, and I’ll need to try another bottle for a longer review, but I suggest getting to the beer store and picking this up if you can. You may not run into another Braggot again outside of homebrewing circles.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/11/Received__A_trio_of_Twilights'

    Received: A trio of Twilights

    Posted: April 11th, 2010, 7:57am CEST by Jon

    The other day the press release for Deschutes’ Twilight Ale hit my email and the first thing I thought was, why is a summer ale being promoted and released over two months before the actual beginning of summer? Seems like a misfire, but a closer read reveals:

    Yes, Twilight Ale is releasing a little earlier than usual this year (it usually hits the shelves and taps in May) because Deschutes’ spring seasonal, Red Chair NWPA, sold out in record time.

    I suppose selling out of a seasonal beer is a good problem to have, but even so, wouldn’t releasing Twilight this early run the risk of running out of Twilight prematurely also? Maybe it’s a scales-of-economy type of thing I’m missing, or something.

    Regardless, these came to my doorstep yesterday:

    Deschutes Twilight Summer Ale

    So of course there’s one in the fridge already.

    I’m kind of liking the new label design this year; portending things to come?

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/11/Received__A_trio_of_Twilights'

    Received: A trio of Twilights

    Posted: April 11th, 2010, 7:57am CEST by Jon

    The other day the press release for Deschutes’ Twilight Ale hit my email and the first thing I thought was, why is a summer ale being promoted and released over two months before the actual beginning of summer? Seems like a misfire, but a closer read reveals:

    Yes, Twilight Ale is releasing a little earlier than usual this year (it usually hits the shelves and taps in May) because Deschutes’ spring seasonal, Red Chair NWPA, sold out in record time.

    I suppose selling out of a seasonal beer is a good problem to have, but even so, wouldn’t releasing Twilight this early run the risk of running out of Twilight prematurely also? Maybe it’s a scales-of-economy type of thing I’m missing, or something.

    Regardless, these came to my doorstep yesterday:

    Deschutes Twilight Summer Ale

    So of course there’s one in the fridge already.

    I’m kind of liking the new label design this year; portending things to come?

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/08/The_next_Session__Collaborations'

    The next Session: Collaborations

    Posted: April 8th, 2010, 5:48am CEST by Jon

    Mario Rubio has the honor of hosting The Session next month (May), and he’s going to be running the show over at Hop Press. The topic: Collaborations!

    The Hop Press is a collaboration of writers from around the world working on a common site. As host of The Session for May, I thought it was only appropriate for the Hop Press to be a place for a gathering of posts about collaborations.

    Feel free to have fun with the topic. Drink a collaborative beer. Who’s brewed some of your favorite collaborations? Who have been some of your favorite collaborators? Who would you like to see in a future collaboration?

    As the topic is collaborations, working with each other is encouraged.

    I like the idea of blogging collaboration for The Session. Any takers?

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/06/The_Brewery_at_Lake_Tahoe'

    The Brewery at Lake Tahoe

    Posted: April 6th, 2010, 7:51am CEST by Jon

    As part of our Spring Break trip to Lake Tahoe, we rented a condo that was right on the Lake (it was a big family trip, so all of us together were able to afford it), and just happened to be across the street from The Brewery at Lake Tahoe. And when I say across the street, I mean literally just across the street from the condo complex: we couldn’t have stayed any closer.

    Naturally enough, we ate there several times, and the first night bought a growler than we subsequently had filled a few more times during the trip. Overall, The Brewery has decent beers and great food, and I highly recommend it if you’re in South Lake Tahoe. Now that I’ve spoiled it, let’s get into the review.

    The Brewery at Lake Tahoe

    The Brewery was established in 1992 in what was formerly a house and garage, and still retains that sort of feel: the dining area is has that kind of “converted cottage” atmosphere while being open and airy, and the bar (and brewing area) is just small enough to border on “cramped” but is comfortable enough to call “intimate” instead.

    The Brewery at Lake Tahoe bar

    For as small as I’m making it seem, we had no problems any of the times we visited getting seats and ordering food and drink; perhaps during the “on-season” (and weekends) there will be a wait, but for us it worked out well.

    The beer: the first night my wife and I sat in the bar and chatted up the bartender, who had a lot of really good information about the brewery itself. If you visit the bar, you’ll notice that there is a big kettle and two fermenting tanks right behind the bar, out in the open—not behind glass as you’ll encounter at many other places. Remember, space is at a premium, and The Brewery has made the most of their space: during the evenings after the last shift is when brewing starts, and the kettle behind the bar is actually a combination mash tun/kettle.

    The Brewery at Lake Tahoe kettle and mash tun

    The Brewery has a five-barrel capacity, and I inquired about the process since the mash tun and kettle are one and the same (there’s nowhere to sparge!): they use grain bags for the mash, and when mashing is complete, have to lift (and drain) them out of the tank through that small opening you see in the picture above.

    Of course, since they can’t sparge the grains and claim a full mashing’s worth of wort, they need to supplement, which they do with malt extracts: one of the first commercial brewers I’ve encountered to do so. Nothing wrong with that at all, though I suspect their cost to produce a beer (having to purchase grain and extract) is higher than your average all-grain brewer’s.

    The fermenters themselves also caught my eye: they were active and bubbling away via blowoff tube right into a bucket behind the bar.

    The Brewery at Lake Tahoe fermenters

    The Brewery at Lake Tahoe blowoff bucket

    I will admit, as a homebrewer, I eat this kind of stuff up, and especially when the staff is so open about their process I’m more enthused about trying the beers. So let’s take a look at what The Brewery offers (their Washoe Wheat Ale and IPA were both out, so I didn’t get to try those):

    The Brewery at Lake Tahoe beer sampler

    • Palisades Pilsner: Crisp with a touch of fruity notes, but more grainy with raw wheat. Not bad actually, with floral notes in the hops. A little rough around the edges, but nicely drinkable. (Far right, bottom row.)
    • White-Out Wit: Seasonal: Served with an orange wedge, and nicely orange color to match. Big coriander nose, and very drinkable—sweet orange (rather than bitter peel) and coriander. Smooth and tasty. (Right, top row.)
    • Needle Peak Ale: Drinkable and a bit hoppy without overdoing it; I’d call it solid but average. Cleanly bitter, nice pale malt base; works well as a session ale. (Second from right, bottom row.)
    • Alpine Amber Ale: Fairly standard amber but has a noticeable burnt sugar aftertaste—burnt marshmallow. For me it works, but as a style marker it’s going to be a problem for some people. I personally like it. (Second from left, bottom row.)
    • Paramount Porter: Thin. Roasty but sweet. More “brown” to my taste what what a Porter should be—but there are some coffee notes which work. (Far left, bottom row.)
    • Bad Ass Ale: The Brewery’s flagship, this version is 9% alcohol by volume. The big strong “Arrogant Bastard” of The Brewery; strong and malty and a bit of hops but not as (relatively) hoppy as AB. It strikes me as an “Imperial Brown”—with a bit of extra hops. (Center, bottom row.)
    • Star Lake Stout: Seasonal: Unfortunately, this beer was infected or similar: Medicinal, band-aid flavors. There’s some notes of a sweet stout here, but unfortunately I get the plastic-y notes and have a problem getting past it. Nice dry character in the back, even so—so it could be good. (Left, top row.)

    When we filled the growler, the first night we got Bad Ass Ale, and then two subsequent fillings were the Needle Peak Ale. I liked the White-Out Wit enough to have another pint of that when we picked up pizza there one night, and if I had the opportunity to try the Alpine Amber again I would—I actually enjoyed the burnt marshmallow aftertaste (reminds me of roasting marshmallows while camping).

    This line-up, plus the Washoe Wheat and IPA I mentioned, are the standard beers you’ll find there. (There is also a seasonal brown that is brewed at other times.) However, the bartender did tell me that they were talking about brewing both a barleywine and a barrel-aged stout in the near future—something to look forward to!

    There are some tanks behind glass (not everything is behind the bar, in other words):

    The Brewery at Lake Tahoe serving and conditioning tanks

    These are the conditioning and serving tanks, naturally (and there are apparently more in a basement area), and thus are kept cool. One of those actually did have the IPA conditioning in them, but it wasn’t going to be ready until at least Friday (the day we left). Maybe next time.

    The food: No pictures here, unfortunately, but I will say all The Brewery’s food that we had was really good. The first night I had the Chicken Ranchero Wrap, grilled, which was tangy and spicy and filling, and I’d definitely order again; the chicken curry soup my wife ordered as a side (I don’t remember her main dish, but that was good, too) was excellent.

    Another night we ordered pizzas to take back to the condo; they were great, particularly the Philly cheesesteak pizza. Their websites claims it’s the “best pizza on the Lake,” and based on what we had, who am I to argue? Seriously, it was top-notch.

    We also had the Bruschetta appetizer, and while the sourdough bread was good, it was the tomato and basil dip which really made the dish. Zesty, refreshing, light, and perfect on the crisp bread.

    My sister-in-law also had and raved about their “Portabella stack” which I gather is a loaded veggie-friendly sandwich using grilled Portabella mushroom slices as the “bread.”

    Bottom line: The food is well worth the trip, even if beer isn’t your thing. The beer itself is average and drinkable; you could do a lot worse and for the setup they have, they’re doing all right. The staff was friendly and helpful and we had a good time; what more could you ask for?

    The Brewery at Lake Tahoe
    3542 Lake Tahoe Blvd.
    South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
    (530) 544.2739

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/05/Received__Firestone_Walker_Solace'

    Received: Firestone Walker Solace

    Posted: April 5th, 2010, 8:04am CEST by Jon

    These two bottles arrived on Friday:

    Firestone Walker Solace

    Firestone Walker’s new Solace, a “sort of unfiltered fusion of a Hefeweizen and a Belgian Saison.” It’s a seasonal release from Paso Robles that makes its first appearance in bottles.

    Should be an interesting beer to try.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/03/The_Session__38__Cult_Beer'

    The Session #38: Cult Beer

    Posted: April 3rd, 2010, 5:50am CEST by Jon

    The SessionWelcome to the first Friday of April, and another edition of The Session! You all know the drill by now, right? If not, pop on over to Jay’s site and read his most excellent summary. In the meantime, I’m going to dive right into it.

    This month’s Session is being hosted by Sean Inman over at Beer Search Party:

    With Kate the Great Day a recent memory and the day of the Dark Lord fast approaching, I started thinking about what beer or beers that I would get up at 4:00 in the morning, drive across state lines, stand in a long unmoving line in the cold and rain for the chance to taste with a crowd the size of Woodstock.

    There’s more to it than that: Sean presents several questions in this vein of “cult beer” and I thought I’d mix it up a bit from my usual style of writing for the Session and answer them as if it were an interview. Off we go!

    What beers have you tasted recently (say, the last six months or so) that is worthy of their own day in the media sun?

    That’s a tough question because a) there have been a lot of good beers and b) it’s hard to get past the notion that for a beer to get its “day in the media sun” it needs to be a big boisterous beer like a Dark Lord or an Abyss. But the reality is that those big beers are more expensive and time-consuming to make and by necessity are released on a limited basis, and this lends to the cachet of these cult beers. I’d love to see more lighter, session beers get this kind of attention, but if those beers are available year-round and easy to acquire, it’s not a story.

    In the past six months, some beers I’d pick as “worthy” would be Pelican Brewery’s Kiwanda Cream Ale, Coronado Brewing’s Orange Ave Wit, and Sierra Nevada’s Bigfoot Barleywine. Yes, I know I threw a big beer in that list, but Bigfoot is one of the best American Barleywines around (in fact, I’m drinking one as I write this), and I think it deserves much more attention.

    In general, I’d love to see my local Bend Brewing Company get a ton of cult beer attention—they are producing some fantastic beers (yes, HopHead, but more importantly, Desert Rose) that should absolutely be sought out by beer geeks.

    And to add a little extra to it, how does “great” expectations affect your beer drinking enjoyment?

    That’s a loaded question; if I have great expectations for a beer and it doesn’t deliver, then the disappointment is bigger. I know I’ll catch some heat for this one, but I recently had The Bruery’s Two Turtle Doves, which beer geeks online have uniformly been raving about, and I really wasn’t too impressed (I haven’t posted a review yet, but will soon). I suspect a build-up of expectations played a part in that.

    On the other hand, approaching a beer with little or no expectations and having it turn out great is a better experience, I think. I’ll (once again) point to Widmer’s Cherry Oak Doppelbock as a prime example of this. I had no real expectations, and it was a fantastic beer. I think not expecting that definitely added to my enjoyment.

    Would my expectations be high if I attended a big beer release, like Dark Lord Day or this year’s Pliny the Younger release? Damn straight, and as such the beer had better be absolutely fabulous to match. Or the experience itself (regardless of the beer) had better be worth it. Or both.

    AND If you have attended one of these release parties, stories and anecdotes of your experience will be welcomed too.

    I really haven’t attended anything like that; the closest I’ve come is attending a Deschutes Brewery release from time to time, and those are always low-key events: a release party at their downtown Bend pub, where the only line you’ll have to wait in is to get a seat in the restaurant. Oh, and I’ve waited in line for the Deschutes Brewery annual garage sale—but never for very long.

    Of course, if someone offered me airline tickets to Indiana to attend Dark Lord Day, I sure wouldn’t turn them down.

    What beer have you tasted recently (say, the last six months or so) that is worthy of their own day in the media sun?

    And to add a little extra to it, how does “great” expectations affect your beer drinking enjoyment?

    AND If you have attended one of these release parties, stories and anecdotes of your experience will be welcomed too.

  • Permalink for 'The_Brew_Site/2010/04/01/The_Beer_Hacker__Brewing_on_the_cheap__The__20_beer_challenge'

    The Beer Hacker: Brewing on the cheap: The $20 beer challenge

    Posted: April 1st, 2010, 6:00pm CEST by Jon

    This is the latest in a series of articles about the economic impact of brewing your own beer at home.

    One of the things that inspired this series was a sort of challenge I had in mind: Would it be possible to walk into the Brew Shop with only a $20 bill and walk out with all the necessary ingredients to brew a five-gallon batch of beer?

    Why $20? Well, at one point when there was a bit of belt-tightening going on, it seemed like a reasonable price point to support my beer habit: the equivalent of a case of beer for $10, cheaper even than the alternative—canned macro lagers which run around $13-15 per case. Could I really produce beer cheaper than on-sale PBR? The more I thought about it, the more I decided I had to explore it.

    Of course, you can brew some pretty awful stuff for pretty cheap, so of course one of the requirements is that it has to be good beer—flavorful and enjoyable. So, for less than the retail cost of any beer on the shelves, can it be done?

    There are some guidelines and assumptions to keep in mind:

    • As I mentioned, the beer needs to be a quality brew: flavor, character, more enjoyable to drink than cold canned lagers. Otherwise, what’s the point?
    • $20 won’t buy much, so heavier, higher-alcohol beers are out of the question.
    • There’s nothing wrong with raiding the pantry for adjuncts and additions: anything you have already in the house can be considered “found” ingredients that don’t count against the $20, particularly if it’s something that doesn’t have a “high turnover rate”—in other words, it’s not being used (much) and won’t need to be replaced any time soon.
    • You should already have all the equipment you need to brew your beer—this isn’t a challenge to see how cheaply you can put together a basic brewing system.
    • Prices I quote are the current ones at my local Brew Shop. Your mileage may vary.

    Since I’m (currently) an extract brewer, I approached this challenge in an extract frame of mind. But not to worry: I’ll also tackle the all-grain perspective as well.

    Extract

    Obviously the biggest expense in the beer is going to be the fermentables: malt extract, either in liquid or dried form (DME). We can immediately discount liquid: the seven pound container costs $18, and that would leave me with only enough money left over to buy a packet of dried yeast.

    Fortunately the Brew Shop sells DME in three-pound and one-pound packages at cheaper prices: $11 and $4.25, respectively. That makes it easier to work with, but it’s still apparent that we’re probably looking at about four pounds of DME as a maximum: $15.25, which leaves some wiggle room for hops and yeast. And possibly a few ounces of specialty grains.

    Knowing this informs us better of our end target: three to four pounds of DME by itself will give you a starting gravity in the range of 1.027 to 1.036 for five gallons of beer, which can get you in the range of 2-3.6% alcohol by volume in the finished product. That certainly makes for a light session beer, but if you want something stronger, the cheapest way to add strength is by adding sugar.

    Gasp! Adding sugar as an adjunct! Isn’t such a thing strictly verboten?!? Hardly! Belgian brewers use sugar as an adjunct all the time, and forget the old myth about sugar adding a cidery character to your beer—it just isn’t true. Stan Hieronymus has done a good job debunking the sugar myth, both in his book Brew Like a Monk and on his blog. Adding sugar (corn or even table/cane sugar) to the fermentables bill will add strength, lighten up the body, and won’t cost much at all.

    I wouldn’t recommend more than 20-25% of the fermentables as sugar, though, which means at most a pound in addition to the three or four pounds of DME. Keeping those numbers in mind, here’s a table with some approximate gravities and alcohol expectations for a five-gallon batch of beer:

    Fermentables Original Gravity (OG) ABV range Cost*
    3# DME 1.027 1.9 – 2.5% $11
    3# DME + 1# corn sugar 1.034 2.9 – 3.4% $12.25
    3# DME + 1# table sugar 1.036 3.1 – 3.6% $11 – 11.67
    4# DME 1.036 3.1 – 3.6% $15.25
    4# DME + 1# corn sugar 1.043 4.1 – 4.6% $16.50
    4# DME + 1# table sugar 1.045 4.3 – 4.8% $15.25 – 15.92

    * These costs are based on our previous charts—in particular, corn sugar costs $1.25 per pound. But guess what? You likely already have table (cane) sugar in your pantry—so I’m ranging the table sugar costs from free (you already have it) to approximate cost per pound (based on an average cost of $0.67 per pound in the grocery store (bargain brand, of course)).

    With this data, there are a number of beer styles we can experiment with:

    • Ordinary Bitter
    • Mild Ale
    • Scottish Light 60/- to Heavy 70/-
    • Berliner Weiss
    • American Light Lager
    • Blonde/Cream Ale
    • English Brown Ale

    (In the case of Berliner Weiss, you’d want to use wheat malt extract. The Brew Shop has wheat DME for $4.75 per pound. Of course, there’s a whole lactic sourness issue with this style that may not be viable for $20.)

    Note, of course, that in addition to light extract, you can (usually) also purchase amber and dark extracts at the same price—so you’re not going to be limited to lighter-colored and flavored beers (just limited on strength).

    What about specialty grains? Let’s get to those in a minute; first, there are two other ingredients that have fixed price points that can’t be avoided: hops and yeast.

    Most hops come in two-ounce packages, so that’s what you’ll have to work with, and our budget (probably) will allow you one package of hops that range in price from $3.25 to $3.75. Fortunately this should apply to hops across the board, so if you want a bitter beer you can purchase high alpha acid hops at the same rate as lower alpha acid (aroma) hops.

    Similarly, you can get a packet of dried yeast for $1.25, so that’s the budget price we’ll work with. These days dried yeasts are of a decent quality so you shouldn’t have to worry about the “good old days” of dubious yeast that might be little better than what you’d put in bread.

    Knowing these two fixed prices, here’s an updated pricing chart based on the above one, with an additional figure: remaining money to play with.

    Fermentables OG ABV Cost Remaining
    3# DME 1.027 1.9 – 2.5% $15.50 – 16 $4 – 4.50
    3# DME + 1# corn sugar 1.034 2.9 – 3.4% $16.75 – 17.25 $2.75 – 3.25
    3# DME + 1# table sugar 1.036 3.1 – 3.6% $15.50 – 16.67 $3.33 – 4.50
    4# DME 1.036 3.1 – 3.6% $19.75* $0.25
    4# DME + 1# corn sugar 1.043 4.1 – 4.6% $21** ($1)
    4# DME + 1# table sugar 1.045 4.3 – 4.8% $19.75 – 20.42* $0.25 ($0.42)

    * Since adding 50 more cents to a hops price would push the total over $20, we have to only look at the cheaper hops (whatever they may be).
    ** Since even the cheaper hops push the price to $21, this option would be knocked out of our challenge.

    It’s clear from this chart that if we want to incorporate any specialty grains in the beer, it needs to be with the 3-pound DME recipe. Assuming an average price of $2 per pounds for the grains (depending on the grain, it ranges from $1.90 to 2.25 per pound), we could use anywhere from about 2.5 to 4 pounds of specialty grains within the $20 budget—not bad at all!

    All-grain

    As we discovered from the last article, all-grain brewing saves you about 28% over the cost of extract brewing. That puts the dollar figures in the above chart in the range of $11.16 to $15.12—plenty of wiggle room inside the budget. In fact, you’d be able to scale your recipe up to 12 to 20 pounds of grains within the $20 budget, which opens up most beer styles to brewing availability.

    Need I say more? If you’re set up for all-grain, and are looking for a budget challenge, start with $15 rather than $20. Or change the parameters: can you walk in with your $20 and walk out with all the ingredients you need to brew a tasty, quality beer, and one or two bottles of craft beer from the bottle shop to enjoy while brewing it?

    Pantry Raiding

    I did mention the use of “found” ingredients already on-hand to liven up your beer, and not count against the budget. Off the top of my head, these could include:

    • Molasses
    • Honey
    • Rolled oats
    • Raisins (and other dried fruits)
    • Brown sugar (though generic brown sugar is just cane sugar colored with molasses)
    • Coffee
    • Maple syrup (though commercial/generic syrup is mostly corn syrup)
    • Cocoa/chocolate
    • Spices

    And of course, you could supplement the pantry by taking any leftover money and browsing the grocery store for interesting additions. (In fact, pantry raiding and grocery browsing might make an interesting “Brewing on the cheap” article on their own.)

    Conclusion

    Obviously, keeping the budget considerations I laid out in mind, you can absolutely walk into your Brew Shop with a $20 bill and walk out with everything you need to brew a potentially great batch of beer—given that your Shop has similar prices to what I’ve presented here.

    I had a sense of this before, though last year hop prices were in the $5-6 range and presented more of a problem. But solidifying the numbers and breaking down by the fermentables possibilities is definitely eye-opening. It can be done.

    Can you do it?